Legal Opinion
Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 31, 2012No. 06-937LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge.
This case is one of many eases before the Court whereby Defendant alleges that the ease must be dismissed pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1), relying on 28 U.S.C. § 1500 as interpreted by United States v. Tohono O’odham Nation, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1723, 179 L.Ed.2d 723 (2011) (“Tohono O’odham ”). In this ease, it is undisputed that Plaintiff filed its complaint in this Court, and then, several hours later and on the same day, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Defendant argues that this fact, the order of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- John C. Boyle, Paintiff-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Halim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Resource Investments, Inc. and Land Recovery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Warren Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.