Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Vandermay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1965No. 37696PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings favorable to plaintiff, who is now respondent. A major issue in this case is the legal meaning of a written stipulation for judgment signed by counsel for each of the parties hereto, which was filed in a prior suit instituted to obtain a foreclosure of a second mortgage in which appellants Vandermay, as holders thereof, were plaintiffs, and respondent Pearson was a party defendant because of her ownership of a third mortgage on the premises. The stipulation for judgment was made between the Vandermays and Phyllis Pearson because the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayflower Air-Conditioners, Inc. v. West Coast Heating Supply, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hodgson v. BicknellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Trumble v. WasmerWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Town of ForksWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Barnum v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bailey v. Town of ForksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. City of Moses Lake v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Hanson Industries, Inc. v. KutschkauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API