Legal Opinion

Trumble v. Wasmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1953No. 32376PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Plaintiffs consolidated three separate causes of action founded in quantum meruit and instituted this suit to recover the reasonable value of their services, over and above their fixed annual salaries (each of which was less than $5,000 per year) for the period from October, 1942, through December, 1945. Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment on the pleadings dismissing their consolidated actions.

For the purposes of this appeal, respondent Louis Wasmer will be referred to as though he were the only respondent.

In order to review the trial court’s judgment, it is necessary to set forth in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nussenbaum v. Chambers & Chambers Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Morford v. Bellanca Aircraft Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Skagit River Navigation & Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pearson v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Yakima Hardware Co. v. StricklerWashington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mills v. Inter Island Telephone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Joslin v. JoslinWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hodgson v. BicknellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Pearson v. VandermayWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Trumble v. WasmerWashington Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API