Legal Opinion

Hodgson v. Bicknell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1956No. 33456PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of respondent as judgment creditor against appellant school district No. 402-37, of Prescott, Washington, as garnishee defendant upon a controverted answer of the garnishee defendant entered after hearing by the court.

The principal debtors, Floyd Bicknell and his wife, defendants below, have joined in this appeal and have filed a joint brief with appellant school district No. 402-37, of Prescott, Washington.

For purposes of clarity, we shall hereinafter refer to plaintiff, George Hodgson, as respondent; defendant Floyd Bicknell as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trumble v. WasmerWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. North Coast Enterprises, Inc. v. Factoria PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Barnum v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Loger v. Washington Timber Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. City of Moses Lake v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Pearson v. VandermayWashington Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API