Legal Opinion
Osseiran v. International Finance Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 27, 2007No. Civil Action 06-336 (RWR)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Salah Osseiran brought this action against the International Finance Corporation (“IFC”) for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and breach of a confidentiality agreement. IFC moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to IFC’s immunity from suit, for failure to state a claim, and due to forum non conveniens, among other things. IFC is not immune in this case, Osseiran has failed to state a claim for breach of contract, but he has adequately alleged promissory estoppel and breach of confidentiality, and this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Highland Renovation Corp. v. Hanover Insurance GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Advantage Healthplan, Inc. v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Parnigoni v. ST. COLUMBA'S NURSERY SCHOOLDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Osseiran v. International Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Intelect Corporation v. Cellco Partnership GpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.