Legal Opinion

Cafarella v. Char

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1980No. 6359PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE .COURT BY

PADGETT, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered following a directed verdict for the defendant at the close of all of the evidence in a jury trial of a dental malpractice action. We hold that a directed verdict was improperly granted and that the case should be reversed for a new trial.

Appellant claimed that beginning in December, 1971 and for approximately a year thereafter, the appellee negligently performed dental services for him including gum surgery, bleaching of teeth and root canal work causing infection, inflammation and disease with various and manifold…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Budget Rent-A-Car CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Farrior v. PaytonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City & County of Honolulu v. BONDED INVEST. CO., LTD.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Striker v. NakamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Yorita v. OkumotoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Boudreau v. General Electric Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Azer v. MyersHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. The Nature Conservancy v. NakilaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API