Legal Opinion

The Nature Conservancy v. Nakila

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1983No. 8245; CIVIL NO. 3197PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

The appeals in this case are (1) by claimant Andrew Nakila (Nakila) from an order denying his motion to set aside an entry of default and (2) by defendants Mary B. and Mildred C. Drummond (collectively the Drummonds) from the judgment. The judgment (a) declared that plaintiff Jean Waggoner Stehlin (Stehlin) 1 and defendant The Nature Conservancy (TNC) are the owners of an undivided 85% interest in the land covered by Royal Patent Grant 3057 (Grant 3057) and that the Drummonds are the owners of an undivided 15% interest, (b) held that defendant Hana Ranch, Inc.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Earle T. CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  3. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. Bernard Lust, Trading as Sydney Lust Theatres, and Independent Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. Turner v. WillisHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Aga v. HundahlHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Azer v. MyersHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sittner v. SchrieverUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United Truck Rental Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Kleenco Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API