City & County of Honolulu v. BONDED INVEST. CO., LTD.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*386OPINION OF THE COURT BY
KOBAYASHI, J.
On May 23, 1969, pursuant to the eminent domain provisions of HRS § 101, the City and County of Honolulu (City), filed condemnation proceedings to acquire two contiguous parcels of beach front land located between Farrington Highway and the ocean at Waianae, Oahu.
The subject properties are part of lands purchased by Bonded Investment Company, Ltd., from Mokuleia Ranch and Land Company, Ltd. The properties consist of two parcels: parcel 63 with an area of 73,616 square feet and parcel 64 with an area of 48,115 square feet, respectively, as shown on Maps 4…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Ramacorti v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Kashiwa v. ConeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Wakabayashi v. Hertz Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. LymanHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
- Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. FergusonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Kenai v. BurnettAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.