Legal Opinion
Grogan v. Chaffee
California Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1909No. L.A. No. 2054PublishedCited by 34 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A judgment of reversal having been heretofore rendered herein, a rehearing was ordered. The opinion originally filed was prepared by Sloss, J., and read in part as follows:—
“The plaintiff appeals from a judgment against him, following an order sustaining a demurrer to his amended complaint. The demurrer is based upon both general and special grounds. On this appeal, however, the respondent limits his argument in support of the ruling on the demurrer to the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We are satisfied that there is no…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Fowle v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. National Wholesale Druggists' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Estate of BrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.