Legal Opinion
Benson v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 21, 1993No. 9005-03217; CA A68717PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*408De MUNIZ, J.
Petitioner is the owner of several unoccupied residential buildings that the City of Portland has declared derelict and required to be registered pursuant to Chapter 24.80 of the Portland City Code (PCC). He brought this writ of review proceeding, seeking reversal of the city’s orders on the grounds that the derelict building legislation violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses1 of the federal constitution and the takings clauses of the state and federal constitutions. The trial court upheld the orders. Petitioner appeals, and we affirm.
PCC 24.15.065 defines a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Seawall Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hans Hoeck v. City of Portland, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Landis v. CNA InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Rogue Valley Ass'n of Realtors v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Butchart v. Baker CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Lincoln City Chamber of Commerce v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.