Legal Opinion

Rogue Valley Ass'n of Realtors v. City of Ashland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1999No. LUBA No. 97-260; CAA103845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision remanding the City of Ashland’s zoning ordinance amendments from which petitioner appealed, but rejecting several of the specific arguments advanced by petitioner. We affirm.

The amendments were enacted through the Hillside Development Ordinance (HDO), and they have the general effect of increasing the restrictiveness of the city’s regulation of residential development on hillside and sloped areas. Among the arguments that petitioner made to LUBA was that various provisions of the HDO lack the “clear and objective” standards that ORS 197.307 requires.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benson v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Roberts v. City of Cannon Beach (A184314)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Roberts v. City of Cannon Beach (A184314)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Rudell v. CITY OF BANDONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API