Rogue Valley Ass'n of Realtors v. City of Ashland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision remanding the City of Ashland’s zoning ordinance amendments from which petitioner appealed, but rejecting several of the specific arguments advanced by petitioner. We affirm.
The amendments were enacted through the Hillside Development Ordinance (HDO), and they have the general effect of increasing the restrictiveness of the city’s regulation of residential development on hillside and sloped areas. Among the arguments that petitioner made to LUBA was that various provisions of the HDO lack the “clear and objective” standards that ORS 197.307 requires.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Benson v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Roberts v. City of Cannon Beach (A184314)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Roberts v. City of Cannon Beach (A184314)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Rudell v. CITY OF BANDONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012