Legal Opinion

United States v. One Ford Coupe Automobile, 1934 Model, Motor No. 18-1049806

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 13, 1939No. 39PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, District Judge.

In this case, the Government proceeds by way of libel to forfeit an automobile under Section 1441, Title 26, United States Code Annotated, Section 3450, R.S.

The Universal Credit Company has intervened and, after alleging that it is the innocent holder of a lien indebtedness on the cal', contests its forfeiture on the grounds that the facts do not bring it under the statute.

The stipulation is largely made up of agreements with regard to the bona fides of the intervenor and its innocence in the premises. These matters have no materiality here, as there is no provision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  3. States v. ManganoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. United States v. One Studebaker AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1924
  5. United States v. One 1920 Premier AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1942 Pontiac Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1944
  2. United States v. Ford Coupe AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  3. United States v. One 1942 StudebakerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  4. United States v. One 1939 Model Ford Pickup Truck, Motor No. 4662201District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
  5. United States v. 162-10/12 Cases Containing Approximately 415 Proof Gallons of Distilled SpiritsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API