Legal Opinion

United States v. 162-10/12 Cases Containing Approximately 415 Proof Gallons of Distilled Spirits

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 9, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, District Judge.

The United States has moved for summary judgment of forfeiture with respect to 162-10/12 eases of distilled spirits which it claims were concealed or deposited with intent to defraud it of certain taxes. Its motion is granted.

The action was brought under the Revenue Act of 1939, as amended, former 26 U.S.C.A. § 3321(b) (1). The libel alleges that the spirits were seized at the business premises of the claimant; that at the time of the seizure they were subject to tax and that they were deposited and concealed with intent to defraud the United States of this tax; and that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. The Evergreens v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Currency in the Total Amount of $2,223.40District Court, N.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API