Legal Opinion

United States v. One Studebaker Automobile

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 17, 1924No. D. L. 767PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Libel-for forfeiture. Suit by the United States against one Studebaker automobile; Shearn Moody, claimant, intervening.

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

This is a libel by the United States to fprfeit one Studebaker automobile, seized under the following state of facts, as shown by the following stipulation:

“The automobile in question was the property of PhillipJLieata. The intervener, Shearn Moody, held a valid, subsisting first lien for the purchase money of the ear in amount of six hundred ninety-seven and Oa/ioo ($697.96) dollars, plus interest at 10 per cent, from the date of the filing of the intervention herein, and - per cent, attorney’s fees; that the intervener, Shearn Moody, had no knowledge whatever of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dukes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  2. United States v. MinceyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
  3. United States v. One Cadillac Automobile Bearing Motor No. 61-v-238District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1923
  4. United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  5. United States v. One Kissel Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  3. United States v. One Bay State RoadsterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1924
  4. United States v. One Ford Coupe Automobile, 1934 Model, Motor No. 18-1049806District Court, W.D. Texas · 1939
  5. United States v. MilstoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API