Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Alfred E. Bockhorst

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1972No. 712-70PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois, brought this diversity action for declaratory judgment of nonliability on a policy of automobile insurance which it had issued to Alfred E. Bockhorst, a Kansas resident. The complaint alleged that a third party defendant was asserting a claim in excess of $10,000, arising out of an automobile accident for which the company would be liable if the policy was in force at the time of the accident. Bockhorst answered and counterclaimed, alleging that the policy was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seavey Ex Rel. Ellis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Van Hulle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Schneider v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Matlock ex rel. Matlock v. HollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. EhrhardtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Marook v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
  4. Vargas v. Nautilus InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Hennes Erecting Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API