Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Republic Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1933No. 31,320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action on two policies of insurance issued by a mutual fire insurance company.

*572The defense was that plaintiff had rendered the policies nugatory by obtaining additional insurance without the written consent of defendant indorsed on them as provided by the by-laws which were incorporated in the insurance contracts.

Plaintiff’s petition was in two counts, the first of which alleged that defendant had issued a policy, No. 54,054, for $1,000 on plaintiff’s farm dwelling and $500 on his household goods. The second cause of action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pettijohn v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Kennedy v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Swedish American Insurance v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Brenn v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reser v. Southern Kansas Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Lohr v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Osborn v. Wheat Growers Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Lallak v. Farmers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Peterson v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API