Legal Opinion

Pettijohn v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1917No. 20,674PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Norton district court; WILLIAM S. Langmade, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In an action brought by B. W. Pettijohn against the Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company upon a policy of fire insurance upon plaintiff’s farm property, the latter recovered judgment and the defendant appeals. The trial was by the court alone, a jury having been waived.

Defendant refused to pay the loss on the ground that plaintiff had violated a provision of the policy that it should be “void at the election of the company, if without the consent of the secretary or general agent of the company endorsed hereon, any other insurance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Phenix Insurance v. MungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Burlington Insurance v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Phenix Insurance Co. of Brooklyn v. WeeksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Earth Scientists v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  2. Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Eikelberger v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Hole v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Egnatic v. NguyenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API