Legal Opinion

Georgia Talc Co. v. Cohutta Talc Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1913PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Processioning. Before Judge Fite. Murray superior court. September 10, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

The Georgia Talc Company and the Cohutta Talc Company own adjoining lots of land. The former gave notice to the latter in order to have the line between the respective lots processioned in accordance with the statute. The processioners caused the land to be surveyed and a plat of the same made by the county surveyor, which plat was returned by them pursuant to the statute and filed in the office of the ordinary. The applicant, being dissatisfied with the line as run and marked by the processioners and surveyor, filed his protest, and the papers were returned to the superior court for trial.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. ParrishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Cornwall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Rattaree v. MorrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Chism v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Byrd v. McLucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Reynolds v. KinseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Overstreet v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API