Wolk v. Nichols
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff, Nichols, was awarded $90,000 actual damages and $17,500 punitive damages after a jury trial on his claim against defendants Wolk and Cheney for conversion of citrus trees. After denial of their motion for a new trial and for remittitur, the defendants appeal.
We decide this case pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
Appellants raise six issues on appeal, but we believe that the answer to one is dispositive of the matter. That issue is, were there sufficient facts to sustain the jury’s award of damages?
Viewing the evidence in a light…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Polk v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Tucson v. Apache MotorsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Earley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Carey v. Glenco Citrus ProductsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transparent Payson v. Town of PaysonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015