Legal Opinion
Poppers v. Tamalpais Union High School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1986No. A028130PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
Appellant challenges a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate directing the Tamalpais Union High School District (hereafter respondent or the district) to employ him as a certificated employee effective as of the start of the 1983-1984 school year. The facts are not in significant dispute, and we summarize them as follows.
Appellant first taught for respondent in 1967 as an art instructor. From 1967 to 1981, he taught a variety of subjects including math, social studies, physical education, and creative writing. He also participated in a variety of special…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Barthuli v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Steilberg v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keyes Motors, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Meaney v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Daniels v. Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Daniels v. Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hildebrandt v. St. Helena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.