Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1989No. C000808Published

1Opinion of the Court

212 Cal.App.3d 909 (1989)

260 Cal. Rptr. 867

DEAN DANIELS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

SHASTA-TEHAMA-TRINITY JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. C000808.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 31, 1989.

COUNSEL

Marcus Vanderlaan and Christiana Tiedemann for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

M. Carol Stevens, Janae H. Novotny, Whitmore, Kay & Stevens, Donald A. Selke, Jr., and Wells, Wingate, Small & Graham for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

BLEASE, J.

This mandamus action (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) involves the reemployment rights of regular…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. San Mateo City School District v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API