Knight v. McMahon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
— Here we hold that an administrative law judge awarding payment for retroactive in-home supportive services (IHSS) benefits, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 10950 et seq., has the authority to award interest on retroactive payments. We also hold that appellant was an “aggrieved party” with standing to challenge the trial court’s judgment which awarded her interest but did not determine whether the administrative law judge had authority to award interest.
Joanna Knight appeals from a judgment of the Ventura County Superior Court granting a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Campos v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Weber v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Department of Health Care Services v. Office of Administrative HearingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- San Diego County Deputy Sheriffs Ass'n v. San Diego County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.