Legal Opinion

Frage v. Moriarty

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 23, 1988No. Nos. 88-33 to 88-35; NMCMR 2898M, 1932MPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

This case comes before us on consideration of petitioner’s request for relief in the nature of “a writ of mandamus, ordering his release from confinement, in accordance with the writ” of “habeas corpus previously issued by the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review,” see Frage v. Edington, 26 MJ 927 (1988); the Government’s writ-appeal petition for review of the decision granting that relief1; and upon certificate for review2.

This Court ordered the petitioner and respondents to submit briefs addressing the following issues: whether the military…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. Frage v. EdingtonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. FrageU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. CunninghamNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. DiazNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. MillerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. MillerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API