Legal Opinion
United States v. Koepke
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided November 19, 1965No. 18,612 & No. 18,543PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Kilday, Judge:
The Uniform Code of Military Justice provides in pertinent part that:
“Art. 30. Charges and specifications
“(a) Charges and specifications shall be signed by a person subject to this chapter under oath before a commissioned officer of the armed forces authorized to administer oaths and shall state—(1) that the signer has personal knowledge of or has investigated, the matters set forth therein; and(2) that they are true in fact to the best of his knowledge and belief.”1 [Emphasis supplied.]
It is with the emphasized portion of the above-quoted provision of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- Atwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. AutreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. BattsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. FrageU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
- Soriano v. HoskenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980