Legal Opinion

Knights of Ku Klux Klan, Inc. v. Francis

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1926No. Docket No. 5633PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff commenced three actions against the defendants—two in claim and delivery and one in conversion—to recover the moneys and property held by the defendants as members of the Oakland Klan No. 9. Judgment went for the defendants in each case and the plaintiff has appealed on a bill of exceptions. By stipulation the three appeals have been consolidated and are to be heard as one.

The plaintiff is a corporation having its main office in Atlanta, Georgia; the Oakland Klan No. 9 is an unincorporated subordinate lodge organized and chartered under the constitution of the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Otto v. ProtectiveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Brecheen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola De Beneficencia MutuaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Carroll v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ellis v. American Federation of LaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API