Otto v. Protective
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtSnarls, C. J.
J.—This is an appeal from, a writ of mandate issued by the superior court, commanding appellant to reinstate the respondent, August Otto, to membership in the society, and to restore him to all the rights, privileges, and immunities of membership therein.
The appellant is, and since 1873 has been, an unincorporated association composed of about two hundred persons, tailors by occupation, organized, for the purpose of transacting the business of a benevolent association, of improving the condition of its members, and for protection against unjust and arbitrary encroachment of capital.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robinson v. Yates City Lodge No. 448Illinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Savannah Cotton Exchange v. State ex rel. Warfield & WayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
3Cited by65 opinions
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Polin v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.