Legal Opinion

Carroll v. California Horse Racing Board

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1940No. Sac. 5355PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The controversy which is before this court upon an appeal from a judgment ordering a writ of mandate to issue, concerns the right of the Horse Racing Board, established under the provisions of the California Horse Racing Act (Stats. 1933, p. 2046; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 3421, p. 1634), to suspend the respondent’s license as a trainer of horses. More specifically, the question is whether such action may be taken without affording the licensee a hearing.

On January 1, 1937, petitioner was granted a trainer’s license for a period of one year, under the provisions of the Horse…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API