Legal Opinion

Atlantic National Bank of Boston v. Korrick

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1926No. Civil No. 2391PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— Our attention being called to some inaccuracies of statement, and an entire omission to pass upon-appellees’ cross-assignments, this opinion and decision- is in lieu of the former one.

This case is very similar to the case of the Atlantic National Bank of Boston v. Moore, ante, p. 346, 241 Pac. 601. It involves the same parties plaintiff and the same kind of transaction. It is different in the detail of parties defendant, the amount of cotton sold, size and date of notes, etc.; bnt the transactions were the same in essence. As in that case, the plaintiff and its predecessor in ownership of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Brutinel v. NygrenArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  3. In re MertensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  4. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. WehrmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Fountain v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Highland v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Columbian Peanut Co. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. California Sugar & White Pine Co. v. Whitmer Jackson & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Fishel v. F.M. Ball Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API