Legal Opinion

Alexander v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 12, 2002No. 01-540CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims for reinstatement to his position as a National Guard technician and/or for back pay or, in the alternative, for severance pay. At issue is whether the court has jurisdiction over claims brought by National Guard technicians or whether such claims lie within the exclusive jurisdiction of the state adjutants general. As plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court ordered additional briefing in lieu of oral argument.

FACTS

Michael J. Alexander (“plaintiff’) was employed as a civilian instructor pilot with the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ains, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Harris Patriot Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Goodrich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Sartori v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Alexander v. Michigan Adjutant GeneralDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API