Lichtenstein v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
TeansfebRed from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, G. A. 6534 (T. D. 27885).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
In these two cases the Board of General Appraisers determined the cases solely upon the ground that the protests filed with the collector were insufficient. On appeal to the circuit court, this holding was affirmed, and the importers bring the cases here for review.
The protests are in all respects similar, and one of them is given at length:
New York, February 17, 1906.
Hon. Collector of Customs, Port of New York:
Sir: Notice of dissatisfaction is hereby given with, and protest is hereby made against, your ascertainment and 1 iquidation of duties, and your decision assessing duty at 30 per cent…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Saab Cars Usa, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SternCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Shreve v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Asam Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.