Bliven v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Transferred horn United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York (T. D. 27550).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
The point at issue in this case is .the validity of two protests.
The issuable portion of the protests, which are, except as to particulars noted, identical in language, is as follows:
Protest is hereby made against your decision assessing duty at 1.426 cents per pound or other rate or rates on certain paraffin liquid (vaseline oil) covered by entries below named. The ground of objection, under the tariff act of July 24, 1897, is that said merchandise is free of duty under paragraph 633, or if not, then at 0.2852 cent per pound, as it is made in Germany from Russian petroleum; or if not, then…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Movius v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Homer v. The CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
3Cited by21 opinions
- Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Bowling Green Storage & Van Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Larzelere & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.