Legal Opinion

United States v. Fred. Gretsch Mfg. Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 19, 1938No. 4156Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellee at the port of New York in entry 720755 entered “one case Musical Inst (strings)” and “one case Toys” and in entry 718285 entered “one case Ukulele Strings Musical Instruments,” two cases of “Unmfg Wood, Musical Instruments Violins, Musical Instruments Parts,” and “one case Musical Inst Flutes.”

The collector classified the merchandise in accordance with the advisory classification of the appraiser. The goods entered as toys and flutes were classified as toys and assessed for duty at 70 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1513, Tariff Act of 1930. The merchandise entered as “one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Lichtenstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. Legg v. HeddenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
  4. Malhame & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  5. United States v. Willenborg & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API