Legal Opinion
Tigard Sand and Gravel, Inc. v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 6, 1997No. LUBA 96-182; CA A97209PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming a Clackamas County hearings officer’s declaratory determination that petitioner’s nonconforming use for a rock quarry operation has been lost due to both interruption and abandonment. We affirm.
We take the material facts from LUBA’s opinion:
“Petitioner owns and operates a rock quarry which is the subject of this appeal. The quarry has been a nonconforming use since zoning was first applied to the property in 1973. Between 1984 and 1991, petitioner discontinued blasting, crushing and other quarrying activities at the site, and removed most…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Lane County v. BessettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Marquam Farms Corp. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tigard Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- City of Mosier v. Hood River Sand, Gravel & Ready-Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Johns v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Vickers v. Franklin Cnty. Bd. of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019