Legal Opinion

Collins v. Klamath County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 25, 1997No. LUBA 96-113; CA A96332PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioner Collins complained to the planning director of Klamath County that respondent Simonsen (respondent) 1 was conducting cattle sales and certain other activities in an exclusive farm (EFU) zone, for which a conditional use permit was required and had not been obtained. Under section 54.020A of the county land development code, “farm use[s]” are permitted in EFU zones, while section 54.030C makes “stockyards and animal sales” subject to a conditional use permit requirement. The planning director sought a declaratory classification of respondent’s use, pursuant to section 12.070 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Derry v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Marquam Farms Corp. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gilmour v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Beaver State Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Eugene Sand & Gravel v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API