Krenik v. Westerman

Loring, Justice.

In a suit to recover for personal injuries the plaintiff had a verdict for $21,517.25, and the defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or new trial.

The record presents a question of fact for the consideration of the jury as to defendant’s negligence; and, in view of the disposition we make of the case, it becomes unnecessary to consider the contention that the verdict is excessive.

The principal question presented by the appeal is whether or not the argument of plaintiff’s counsel to the jury Avas so improper and…