Legal Opinion

Crumpton v. B. F. Goodrich Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1942No. 28794PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Both the Common Pleas Court and the Court of Appeals held that the order of the commission denying further compensation as shown by its order of December 5, 1934, was on a non-jurisdictional ground. Both courts held that the order did not entitle the plaintiff to a rehearing, and that the commission was not authorized to grant the same. The Common Pleas Court held that the commission could grant a rehearing only after denial of compensation on a jurisdictional ground; that an appeal to the court could be taken only after such denial following a legally granted rehearing; and that, since there…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Metal Specialty Co. v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Industrial Commission v. RamseyOhio Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API