Legal Opinion
Metal Specialty Co. v. Gregory
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1934No. 24618PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBevis, J.
It is the contention of the relator that the commission, by reason of the proceedings had, is without jurisdiction further to consider this claim or to make findings or orders therein. It seeks accordingly an order of prohibition.
Section 1465-86, General Code, provides:
“The powers and jurisdiction of the board over each case shall be continuing, and it may from time to time make such modification or changes with respect to former findings or orders with respect thereto, as, in its opinion, may be justified. Provided, however, that no such modification or change or any finding or award in…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
- Crumpton v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- Midland Steel Products Co. v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.