Legal Opinion

Diamond v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 4, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00292PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

This case represents one in a series of pro se Plaintiffs’ efforts to obtain relief from federal taxes levied against them. 1 In this ease, Plaintiffs seek refunds for tax years 2006-2011, and abatement of a “frivolous” filing fee assessed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6702, for the 2008 tax year. 2

I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 3

Norman Douglas Diamond and Zaida Gole-fia Del Rosario (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are married United States taxpayers residing in Tokyo, Japan. PI. Ex. A at 5. From 1992 through 1994,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Diamond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Alston-Bullock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Cycenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Martti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API