Diamond v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
This case represents one in a series of pro se Plaintiffs’ efforts to obtain relief from federal taxes levied against them. 1 In this ease, Plaintiffs seek refunds for tax years 2006-2011, and abatement of a “frivolous” filing fee assessed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6702, for the 2008 tax year. 2
I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 3
Norman Douglas Diamond and Zaida Gole-fia Del Rosario (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are married United States taxpayers residing in Tokyo, Japan. PI. Ex. A at 5. From 1992 through 1994,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Diamond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Alston-Bullock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Cycenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Martti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.