Legal Opinion

Cycenas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 12, 2015No. 14-544CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim; Breach of Contract.

ORDER

HORN, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Pro se plaintiff Edward Joseph Cycenas filed suit in this court against “Defendant, United States of America acting through the United States Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service,” (Rural Housing Service). 1 Plaintiff alleges Gordon Fiek, “Chief Principal and Officer of St. Croix Valley Hardwoods, Inc.,” (St. Croix) and St. Croix are “co-eonspirator[s]” with the Rural Housing Service. Plaintiff asserts various claims in his complaint, including breach of…

2Cases cited138 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Barth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Harvey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. San Antonio Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. Voss v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API