Legal Opinion
In Re Gansler
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 2005No. 03-BG-1345PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge.
The Court of Appeals of Maryland reprimanded respondent Douglas F. Gansler for statements that, in his capacity as State’s-Attorney for Montgomery County, Gansler had made on three occasions about matters which the Court of Appeals found had a substantial likelihood of depriving criminal defendants of fair trials. See Attorney Grievance Comm. of Md. v. Gansler, 377 Md. 656, 835 A.2d 548, 574 (2003). Specifically, the Court held that on each occasion Gansler violated Rule 3.6(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits statements by a lawyer that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GanslerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re HewettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re ZakroffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re BeattieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re HerminaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006