Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gansler
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 12, 2003No. Misc. AG No. 81, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATTAGLIA, Judge.
Respondent Douglas F. Gansler was admitted to the Bar of this Court on December 18, 1989. On November 7, 2002, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), 1 filed a petition for disciplinary action, alleging that Gansler violated the following Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (hereinafter “MRPC”): MRPC 3.1 (Meritorious Claims and Contentions), 2 MRPC 3.6 (Trial Publicity), 3 MRPC 3.8 (Special Responsibili ties of a Prosecutor), 4 MRPC 8.2(a) (Judicial and Legal Officials), 5 and MRPC 8.4(a) & (d)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaignanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.