Engeman v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On indictment for keeping disorderly house. In error. Argued at June Term, 1891, before Beasley, Chief Justice, and Justices Van Syckel and Knapp.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by-
Van Syckel, J.
The defendants were convicted in the Passaic County Quarter Sessions for having kept a disorderly house at Clifton, in said county, where betting on horse races was habitually carried on. The judgment of the trial court is in this court by writ of error for review.
The case was tried in the Quarter Sessions before Mr. Justice Dixon and Judge Inglis, one of the judges of the Common Pleas of Passaic county, in the absence of the law judge of said county.
The reason chiefly relied upon for reversal is, that the court so constituted had no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Fritts v. KuhlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
- Commonwealth v. TryonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Lowenstein v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WrightsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Hutchins v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- In Re the Alleged Nullity of "An Act Concerning Alcoholic Beverages, & Supplementing Chapter One of Title 33 of Revised Statutes,"Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Kurre v. American Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.