Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Fritts v. Kuhl
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 15, 1889PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Quo warranto.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The facts which have occasioned this litigation are as follows:
On the 15th of February, 1888, a vacancy occurred in the office of president judge of the Hunterdon Pleas by the death of Mr. Sanderson. At the time of his death the senate was in session, and remained in session until the 30th day of March, 1888.
On the 1st day of March, 1888, the governor nominated the defendant, Richard S. Kuhl, to the office of president judge of the Hunterdon Pleas, to fill the said vacancy. The senate held the nomination until the 20th of March, and then…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stuart v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Briscoe v. President of the Bank of the CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Adams v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Taylor CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Rigg v. WiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NJ v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Creamer v. Twelve Common Pleas JudgesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Werts v. RogersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.