Legal Opinion

In Re the Alleged Nullity of "An Act Concerning Alcoholic Beverages, & Supplementing Chapter One of Title 33 of Revised Statutes,"

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 30, 1943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

• Pursuant to N. J. 8. A. 1:7-4, petitioners, on November 8th, 1942, attacked the enactment of Pamph. L. , 1942, ch. 264, p. 708, approved June 26th, 1942 (“An act concerning alcoholic beverages, and supplementing Chapter one of Title 33, of the Revised Statutes”). That attack is based upon the broad statutory grounds that petitioners had “reason to believe” that L. 1942, supra, was “not approved by the Governor” or “otherwise made effective as law in the manner required by the constitution * * *.” N. J. S. A. 1:7-1.

The statute thus invoked…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Ex Parte CrumpCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Montgomery v. ClevelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Engeman v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Warmoth v. GrahamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re FreygangNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. In Re Application of LambNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. In Re Advisory Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. In Re Application of McCabeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. In Re Application of McGlynnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API