Legal Opinion

Gardner v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 30 opinions

'On error to the Essex Quarter Sessions. On a judgment -of conviction for larceny.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

The first assignments of error are founded on the decision of the court overruling a challenge to the general panel of jurors. A challenge to the array is an exception to the whole body of jurors upon, the panel summoned and returned for service at the term, and is grounded upon some ■default of the sheriff or other officer making the return, in •drawing or returning the jurors, or for partiality or miscon•duct in performing the duties. Co. Litt. 156a, 156b; 3 Burn Just. 962, “Juries;” Thomp. & Merr. Juries, § 126.

The specifications of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. People v. CallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Engeman v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  4. Randall v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Thalheim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
  4. State v. RechnitzMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hite v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API