Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. City of Des Moines

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 6, 1916PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Gomri. — Hubert Utterback, Judge. On June 19, 1911, there was submitted to the voters of Des Moines at a special election this proposition: ‘ ‘ Shall the city of Des Moines purchase, establish, erect, maintain, and operate waterworks with all necessary reservoirs, mains, filters, streams, trenches, pipes, drains, machines, apparatus, and other requirements of waterworks plant or system?” 3,330 votes were cast for the proposition, and 442 against.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Polk District Gomri. — Hubert Utterback, Judge. On June 19, 1911, there was submitted to the voters of Des Moines at a special election this proposition: ‘ ‘ Shall the city of Des Moines purchase, establish, erect, maintain, and operate waterworks with all necessary reservoirs, mains, filters, streams, trenches, pipes, drains, machines, apparatus, and other requirements of waterworks plant or system?” 3,330 votes were cast for the proposition, and 442 against. The city, on October 2d following, adopted the resolution that ‘ ‘ The city of Des Moines do- now proceed to acquire by…

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The city of Des Moines was authorized to acquire or construct a waterworks system (Sec. 720, Code Supp., 1913), and, as it might do under Section 721'of such ‘ Code Supplement, on June 19, 1911, submitted to the voters of the city the question of whether it should purchase, establish, erect, operate and maintain such system. Though a relatively small number voted, a majority favored purchasing, etc., and thereafter the city council proceeded ‘ ‘ to acquire by condemnation” the existing system of the Des Moines Water Company. Section 722, Code Supp., 1913. An appropriate resolution was…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  2. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In the Matter of the Application of Henry W. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. City of Evansville v. State ex rel. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. ClineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. City of BettendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API