Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1928No. Docket No. 1015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendant was indicted on two charges of grand theft. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. The demurrer was overruled, whereupon the defendant entered a plea of guilty of both charges, and judgment was entered against him accordingly. This appeal is from the judgment. Both counts of the indictment are in the same form. The first one is as follows:

“The grand jury of the County of Sacramento hereby accuses William Campbell of a felony, to-wit: Grand Theft, in that on or about the-day of January, A. D. 1925, in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Jourdan v. DonohueNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. State v. FairWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. PlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. FallaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Ullom v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API