Duronslet v. Kamps
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
The trial court issued an injunction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 protecting Jill Duronslet and her immediate family from Joyce Kamps. On appeal, Kamps contends the injunction must be reversed because the only evidence that she made a “credible threat of violence” under section 527.6, former subdivision (a)1 was inadmissible multiple hearsay protected by the physician-patient privilege.
We affirm. We conclude Kamps forfeited her objections to certain hearsay evidence offered at the hearing on Duronslet’s injunction. We also conclude the trial court may…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SamayoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Davila v. Mejia (In re Davila), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Snibbe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- A.H. v. H.N. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.