Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Feuer v. Progressive Horizon, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2016No. B263622PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.
Because of the proliferation of medical marijuana businesses in the City of Los Angeles (City), in 2013, City voters approved the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Ordinance (Proposition D). (L.A. Mun. Code, §45.19.6 et seq.) Proposition D bans medical marijuana businesses, but grants certain qualifying businesses a limited immunity from enforcement of the ordinance. Immune medical marijuana businesses may continue their operations if they comply with the numerous restrictions enumerated in Proposition D. (L.A. Mun. Code, §45.19.6.3.) Among Proposition D’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Loeffler v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. WhitmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Committee to Support the Recall, etc. v. LoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Holistic Supplements v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021