Legal Opinion
Application of Helen M. Krazinski, Robert G. Shepherd and William E. Taft
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 24, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7283PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the examiner’s rejection of product claims 1 to 3 in application serial No. 802,003, filed March 26, 1959, for “Sulfanilamido Triazines and Method of Preparing the Same.” No claim has been allowed.
The invention is an N'-heterocyclie sulfa drug, i. e., a derivative of sulfanilamide,
in which one of the sulfonamide hydro-gens has been replaced by a heterocyclic radical. 1 The invention also includes the alkali metal salts of this compound. According to appellants’ brief:
It must not be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Herbert C. Murray and Durey H. PetersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3Cited by9 opinions
- Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Application of Lewis E. RevenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Ralph E. Miegel and John J. VerbancCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.